Working to break intergenerational trauma

Rewriting the rules of parenting, one wound at a time. 

“You are not the darkness you endured. You are the light that refused to surrender.”

John Mark Green

This article explores the burgeoning recognition among millennial parents regarding the profound impact of intergenerational trauma on familial dynamics and individual mental health and well-being.

This generation, known for being digitally savvy and reflective, is actively working to break harmful patterns passed down from previous generations, thereby adopting more positive psychological environments for their children (Wade, Marks and Hetzel, 2015). This shift represents the psychological concept of conscious parenting (Tsabury, 2010). This method emphasises personal insight and deliberate action, aiming to encourage a supportive and emotionally responsive atmosphere that differs significantly from parenting approaches of the past that may have involved less introspection (Pramono et al., 2020).

This article will delve into the characteristics of millennial parents, the concept of intergenerational trauma, its neurobiological and biological underpinnings, the impact on the parenting brain and various other trauma factors, concluding with strategies for moving forward.

Furthermore, this piece will distinguish intergenerational trauma from other forms of complex trauma, delineating the specific challenges and opportunities for intervention within the familial context (Mooren et al., 2023). It will also explore how the unique societal and technological landscape inhabited by millennials influences their capacity to engage with and mitigate these deep-seated psychological legacies (Hershatter and Epstein, 2010). 

The discussion will also address the role of cultural factors and societal structures in perpetuating or alleviating the transmission of trauma across generations, especially within diverse communities (Sirikantraporn and Green, 2016). The unique upbringing of millennials, characterised by a multicultural environment and a focus on achievement, also shapes their approach to confronting and healing these inherited wounds (Howe and Strauss, 2000). This involves examining the psychological and physiological mechanisms through which traumatic experiences, whether direct or vicarious, can alter genetic expression and neural pathways in subsequent generations, contributing to observable behavioural and emotional patterns (El-Khalil, Caculidis-Tudor and Nedelcea, 2025). This understanding is crucial for comprehending how collective traumas, such as war or systemic oppression, can profoundly affect not only direct survivors but also their descendants, manifesting as psychological and physiological outcomes (El-Khalil, Caculidis-Tudor and Nedelcea, 2025). 

This transmission occurs through complex mechanisms, including epigenetic modifications and alterations in brain development, which can predispose individuals to psychopathology and maladaptive coping strategies (Miller, 2021). Indeed, transgenerational transmission of trauma has been extensively documented, indicating that the exposure to trauma in one generation can significantly impact subsequent generations, often manifesting as complex post-traumatic stress disorder mechanisms (Ridhuan et al., 2021; Abrams, 2021). This includes alterations in DNA methylation that can be passed down, influencing vulnerability to psychological conditions (Bhattacharya et al., 2019). 

Who are millennial parents?

Millennial parents, typically born between 1981 and 1996, are raising children in a world that looks nothing like the one they grew up in. Globally connected, psychologically informed and tech-savvy, they are the first generation to mainstream mental health, Google their trauma symptoms, and bring ChatGPT into therapy sessions as if it were a third co-regulator. This generation of parents is different. They parent in a more emotionally aware way and often question old rules (Jackson, 2018). But what truly defines them isn’t just digital fluency or Instagrammable lunches, it’s their emotional courage. Many are the first in their family lines to say, “It stops with me.”

They are the pivot generation, those standing with one foot in the past, carrying inherited wounds, and the other foot planted firmly in the future, determined not to pass them on. In psychotherapy, this isn’t just a metaphor. It’s a movement. This generation, often characterised by a heightened awareness of psychological complexities and a propensity for self-reflection, is actively engaging with the concept of inherited familial patterns that extend beyond direct experience (Bradfield, 2011). This introspection is leading many to consciously challenge and dismantle cycles of distress, aiming to encourage healthier emotional environments for their offspring (Sangalang and Vang, 2016). This contemporary approach to parenting signals a significant shift from previous generations, where the emphasis was less on psychological inheritance and more on traditional child-rearing practices (Swanzen, 2018). This evolving perspective underscores a pivotal move towards prioritising emotional well-being and systemic family health, rather than solely focusing on physical or material provisions. 

This conscious endeavour to interrupt detrimental intergenerational patterns represents a new developmental path for families, aiming to cultivate resilience and adaptive coping mechanisms across successive generations (Leiner, 2009). This deliberate disruption of established but unhealthy patterns, often termed "breaking generational trauma," involves a nuanced understanding of how historical and familial experiences, though not directly lived, can manifest as present-day challenges (Mohatt et al., 2014). This idea fits with theories about how family issues can be passed down through generations because of unresolved cultural conflicts (Lee, 2019). This involves the transfer of unhealthy behaviours and psychological patterns from parents to their offspring, which can hinder healthy growth and attachment (Mishne, 1996). This phenomenon, initially explored in the context of offspring of Holocaust survivors, highlights how severe psychiatric symptomatology can manifest in children even when their parents appear outwardly resilient (Yehuda and Lehrner, 2018). 

This concept, formally known as the transgenerational transmission of trauma, elucidates how the psychological and physical sequelae of distressing experiences can affect individuals across multiple generations, encompassing both direct and generation-skipping pathways of transmission (Ridhuan et al., 2021). This transmission can occur through various mechanisms, including genetic and epigenetic modifications, neurobiological alterations, and learned behavioural patterns (Kellermann, 2013; Yehuda and Lehrner, 2018; Ridhuan et al., 2021). Understanding these multifaceted pathways is crucial for millennial parents who are committed to interrupting these cycles and encouraging environments that promote emotional resilience and well-being for their children (Bowers and Yehuda, 2015). 

Intergenerational trauma: When pain echoes through DNA

Intergenerational trauma refers to the transmission of emotional, psychological and even biological distress from one generation to the next (Yehuda et al., 2016). These inherited wounds can manifest as:

• Anxiety or depression with no clear "cause."
• Hypervigilance in safe environments.
• Difficulty setting boundaries or expressing needs.
• Chronic guilt, shame or people-pleasing.
• Struggles with identity, belonging or self-worth.

Biologically, trauma leaves fingerprints on the brain and body. Chronic exposure to stress in childhood can dysregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, elevate the stress hormone cortisol, and affect brain regions like the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, the epicentres of fear, memory and executive functioning (Teicher and Samson, 2016).

Beyond neural changes, emerging evidence suggests that traumatic experiences can induce enduring epigenetic modifications in parental germ cells that are subsequently transmitted to offspring, influencing their vulnerability to stress-related disorders (Bowers and Yehuda, 2015). These heritable epigenetic changes may include alterations in DNA methylation patterns, contributing to a predisposition for conditions such as anxiety and depression in subsequent generations (Matosin, Cruceanu and Binder, 2017; Monaco, 2020). This phenomenon underscores a complex interplay between environmental stressors and genomic regulation, where the imprint of ancestral trauma can predispose descendants to similar psychological vulnerabilities (Ullah et al., 2023). While the exact mechanisms and full extent of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans are still subjects of ongoing research, observational studies indicate that the effects of parental stress can persist across generations (Zhou and Ryan, 2023; Youssef et al., 2018). 

Neurobiology, human biology and the parenting brain

In the millennial parent, we often see a powerful inner split: part of them is raising their child, while another part is still frozen in their own unmet childhood needs. Their inner child lives on in their nervous system, sometimes soothing, sometimes sabotaging.

Healing means accessing the ventral vagal state of the nervous system (as per Polyvagal Theory), the place of safety, connection and co-regulation. This state is necessary for secure attachment, emotional availability and emotional attunement (Porges, 2011).

Here’s what millennial parents are doing differently:

Generational norm: “Children should be seen and not heard”

Millennial parent response: “Your feelings are safe with me.”

Generational norm: “Because I said so.”

Millennial parent response: “Let’s talk about it.”

Generational norm: Fear-based punishment.

Millennial parent response: Gentle discipline and emotional repair.

Generational norm: Family secrecy and shame.

Millennial parent response: Naming truths and setting boundaries.

They’re not just parenting their children; they’re re-parenting themselves through their children. The hormonal and neurological shifts that happen during parenting, including changes in oxytocin, dopamine and serotonin levels, make this healing work not only possible but potent. Parenthood becomes a second chance for emotional development and nervous system regulation. This profound interaction highlights how the parent's ongoing neurobiological adaptations, particularly in the brain regions associated with empathy and reward, facilitate a unique opportunity for both the parent and child to establish secure attachment patterns (Bock et al., 2014). This dynamic interplay underscores the potential for parental neuroplasticity to mitigate the intergenerational transmission of adverse stress responses, adopting a more resilient neurological and psychological foundation for the offspring (Bowers and Yehuda, 2015). This neurobiological recalibration in parents can thus interrupt the perpetuation of maladaptive stress responses, encouraging a more robust emotional and psychological legacy for future generations. 

The hidden shadows: Enmeshment, domestic violence and sexual trauma

Many millennial parents I work with, particularly those from collectivistic cultures like South Asian, African, Caribbean and Middle Eastern communities, have grown up with enmeshment trauma, where love was confused with control and emotional autonomy was seen as betrayal. This dynamic often manifests as a blurring of boundaries between parent and child, where individual identities are subsumed by the collective, inhibiting the development of a distinct sense of self. This can lead to significant challenges in adulthood, including difficulties with emotional regulation, establishing healthy relationships, and asserting personal boundaries, thereby perpetuating a cycle of dependency rather than encouraging independent psychological growth.

Such experiences often contribute to a predisposition for anxiety or depression, as individuals struggle to differentiate their own needs and desires from those of their family system (Hong and Park, 2012). Furthermore, the suppression of individual emotional expression within enmeshed family structures can impede the development of adaptive coping mechanisms, leading to internalised psychological distress (Zhao, Zhao and Zhou, 2023). Additionally, a history of interpersonal trauma, such as domestic violence or sexual abuse, in early childhood can profoundly alter neurobiological development, impacting regions crucial for emotional regulation and social cognition (Cross et al., 2017). These traumatic experiences disrupt the formation of secure attachment styles, leading to difficulties in establishing trust and healthy relational patterns in adulthood (Löve et al., 2021). 

Others survived domestic violence or sexual abuse that was minimised, silenced, or wrapped in cultural shame. These traumas leave behind internalised beliefs like:

• “I must keep the peace, no matter what.”
• “My needs are too much.”
• “Love means loyalty, not honesty.”

In the therapy room, we gently unravel these beliefs, metabolising old trauma through emotional attunement, neural rewiring and self-compassion. This process often involves addressing attachment disruptions and fostering a more cohesive sense of self through the therapeutic relationship (Martínez, 2006). This approach allows individuals to process unresolved emotional pain and integrate fragmented aspects of their identity, moving towards a state of greater psychological coherence and resilience (Kolk and Fisler, 1994). 

A South Asian lens: Love, silence and sacrifice

While these dynamics are cross-cultural, in South Asian families, trauma is often woven with duty, sacrifice and a sacred reverence for elders. Love is expressed through doing, not saying. Pain is swallowed whole. Therapy? Still taboo in many circles. This cultural reluctance stems from a complex interplay of factors, including deeply ingrained societal norms that prioritise family honour and collective well-being over individual emotional expression, alongside a prevailing lack of accessible, culturally sensitive mental health resources (Lee, Matthews and Torres, 2025; Giebel et al., 2014). 

But a quiet revolution is happening.

I see South Asian millennial parents arriving in therapy not with blame, but with clarity. They’re grieving what they never received – emotional language, validation, choice – while also holding deep compassion for their parents, who often raised them in trauma: pure survival mode. They are rewriting the script without tearing it up.

Clinical work

In my work as a psychotherapist, I’m counselling a growing wave of millennial parents who are deeply committed to breaking the cycle of intergenerational trauma. This shift is particularly evident, and not restricted to, among clients from collectivistic cultures, including many South Asian families, where silence, sacrifice and suppression were often mistaken for love and loyalty. Millennial parents, especially those who have accessed therapy themselves, are no longer content to repeat patterns that left them emotionally neglected, hyper-independent, hyper-sensitive and hyper-aware or burdened by shame. They’re questioning cultural scripts that once went unchallenged. Instead of obedience, they’re choosing connection. Instead of fear-based discipline, they’re choosing emotional regulation and co-regulation. Instead of “Because I said so,” they’re offering emotional attunement, boundaries and repair. Instead of not knowing, they’re coming to work with me well-read on many areas of psychological insight, having done a lot of research online first. Also, nearly all my clients explore and discuss their findings using Chat GPT with me, which I see as resourceful. What’s also powerful is that many of them aren’t doing this with resentment toward their own parents, but with clarity and sometimes grief. 

They’re starting to understand that intergenerational trauma is often passed down unconsciously, not maliciously. “It didn’t start with you”, as I reference Mark Wolynn’s (2016) content on intergenerational trauma. But now, they’re waking up. They’re educating themselves, seeking therapy and raising children with emotional language, vulnerabilities, presence and choice, things they themselves never received.

In therapy sessions, I often describe this as being the “pivot generation”, the ones who carry the wounds and also carry the tools for healing. They are breaking the trauma cycle from being passed down through their children. It’s named as ‘conscious parenting’. It’s hard and holy work. They’re parenting not just their children, but re-parenting their own inner child too. This frequently involves addressing deeply ingrained habits and cultivating new ways of relating, which can be supported by therapeutic relationships to help parents build their own confidence without needing immediate approval from their children (Beckers, Jakob and Schreiter, 2021). 

We’re living in a time where mental health is finally part of mainstream conversation, there is more mental health awareness communications than ever before, and access to psychological insight is no longer limited to therapy rooms or academic journals. Social media, podcasts and platforms like ChatGPT have made ideas about trauma, attachment and emotional regulation widely available, often in bite-sized, relatable ways. Clients come to therapy already fully versed with psychological terms, having sought content online, and many have self-diagnosed from what they’ve related to from their past experiences. Millennials are also the first generation to come of age in a globalised, hyperconnected world, where cultural norms can be compared, questioned and rewritten in real time. Add to this the rise in therapy accessibility, online communities and a willingness to name what previous generations left unspoken, and you get a perfect storm for progressive change. 

Economic instability, political turbulence and collective traumas like the pandemic have also amplified the urgency to raise children who are resilient, emotionally literate and able to self-regulate (self-soothe, self-manage and self-cope).

For parents, breaking generational cycles is both liberating and exhausting. It requires emotional labour, self-reflection and the courage to confront family narratives that may never be validated by older relatives. But the payoff is profound: they are modelling vulnerability, empathy and healthy boundaries, the building blocks of secure attachment as outlined in John Bowlby’s attachment theory (the foundational psychological model for understanding how all human relationships form and function). For future generations, the ripple effect is extraordinary. Children raised in emotionally attuned environments are more likely to develop strong self-worth, lower anxiety and better coping skills, which reduces the likelihood of them perpetuating cycles of shame or suppression. In neuroscience terms, it’s about creating new neural pathways in the brain, where rewiring the brain toward safety and connection instead of fear and hypervigilance (as per our survival brain), and those patterns can echo forward for decades. This proactive approach to emotional regulation in childhood is crucial, as unresolved negative emotions can lead to significant adult psychopathology (Chen et al., 2022). 

Dementia, trauma and the unspoken connection

One of the most urgent reasons this work matters is its link to dementia. We now know that chronic trauma, especially when unprocessed, increases the risk of cognitive decline and neurodegenerative disorders later in life (Wilson et al., 2006; Cooper et al., 2019). This connection highlights the critical importance of addressing psychological trauma as a preventative measure for maintaining cognitive health and mitigating long-term neurological vulnerabilities (Herat-Gunaratne et al., 2020). For South Asian communities, where dementia knowledge is often low and stigma high, addressing intergenerational trauma becomes a critical, yet often overlooked, component of holistic care and prevention strategies (Herat-Gunaratne et al., 2020). In South Asian communities, dementia diagnoses are rising, yet awareness remains low. Many elders who never had the language for mental health are now losing the language of memory. It’s a devastating full circle where unspoken trauma becomes neurological loss. When millennial parents choose healing, they’re not just protecting their children; they may also be interrupting the neurobiological trajectory of trauma in their own bodies.

Conscious parenting: The path forward

Breaking intergenerational trauma is not about blaming. It’s about naming. It’s about putting language where there was once silence, boundaries where there was once enmeshment and connection where there was once fear.

In psychological terms, this is conscious parenting. In biological terms, it’s neuroplasticity in action, the brain’s ability to change, heal and grow new connections based on new emotional experiences (Siegel, 2012). Yes, it’s hard work. But it’s sacred work. And millennial parents? You are doing it. This conscious effort significantly influences the neurodevelopmental trajectories of their children, encouraging resilience and emotional regulation that was historically absent (Thomason and Marusak, 2016). They are actively reshaping patterns of intergenerational trauma, fostering environments that promote secure attachment and emotional intelligence in their offspring (Fagermoen et al., 2023).

This conscious reshaping can mitigate the transmission of psychological vulnerabilities, fostering healthier familial dynamics that prioritise open communication and individual well-being over previously entrenched, often unspoken, intergenerational burdens (Adams, Grad and Nice, 2023). This proactive engagement with mental health not only benefits the immediate family unit but also addresses broader societal challenges by reducing stigma associated with psychological distress and promoting help-seeking behaviours across generations (Giebel et al., 2014). 

From trauma to legacy

If you are a millennial parent unravelling the thread of inherited trauma, you are not broken; you are breaking through. You are building a legacy not of pain, but of presence.

And one day, your child may say: “I was raised by someone who chose to heal, and that changed everything.” This transformative journey demonstrates the profound impact of intentional emotional labour on familial well-being and the intergenerational transmission of resilience (Denov et al., 2019). This paradigm shift reflects a growing recognition of the need to address historical patterns of adversity to foster robust psychological health across familial lines (Goodman, 2013). This proactive approach not only mitigates the pervasive effects of intergenerational trauma but also cultivates environments conducive to optimal psychological development and interpersonal functioning within subsequent generations (Crankshaw and Dwarika, 2023). 

References

• Abrams, B. (2021) “Encountering transgenerational trauma through analytical music therapy,” Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 30(3), p. 197. doi:10.1080/08098131.2020.1853801.
• Adams, C.R., Grad, R.I. and Nice, M.L. (2023) “An Ecological Perspective of Intergenerational Trauma: Clinical Implications,” Journal of Counseling Research and Practice, 8(1). doi:10.56731/2688-3996.1065.
• Beckers, W., Jakob, P. and Schreiter, M.L. (2021) “Mattering and parental presence in systemic therapy using nonviolent resistance: The utilization of imaginary methods,” Family Process, 61(2), p. 507. doi:10.1111/famp.12694.
• Bhattacharya, S. et al. (2019) “Stress Across Generations: DNA Methylation as a Potential Mechanism Underlying Intergenerational Effects of Stress in Both Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Pre-clinical Predator Stress Rodent Models,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00113.
• Bock, J. et al. (2014) “Perinatal programming of emotional brain circuits: an integrative view from systems to molecules,” Frontiers in Neuroscience. Frontiers Media. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00011.
• Bowers, M.E. and Yehuda, R. (2015) “Intergenerational Transmission of Stress in Humans,” Neuropsychopharmacology. Springer Nature, p. 232. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.247.
• Bradfield, B. (2011) “The Dissociation of Lived Experience: A Relational Psychoanalytic Analysis of the Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma,” International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 6(4), p. 531. doi:10.1080/15551024.2011.606953.
• Chen, J. et al. (2022) “How do Family Factors Impact Children’s Emotional Regulation?,” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research [Preprint]. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220704.049.
• Cooper, C., Sommerlad, A., Lyketsos, C.G. & Livingston, G. (2019). Modifiable predictors of dementia in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 176(4), 312-324.
• Crankshaw, A.T. and Dwarika, V. (2023) “Exploring Psychologists’ Interventions for Transgenerational Trauma in South Africa’s Born Free Generation,” Trauma Care, 3(4), p. 212. doi:10.3390/traumacare3040020.
• Cross, D. et al. (2017) “Neurobiological development in the context of childhood trauma.,” Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 24(2), p. 111. doi:10.1111/cpsp.12198.
• Denov, M. et al. (2019) “Intergenerational resilience in families affected by war, displacement, and migration: ‘It runs in the family,’” Journal of Family Social Work, 22(1), p. 17. doi:10.1080/10522158.2019.1546810.
• El-Khalil, C., Caculidis-Tudor, D. and Nedelcea, C. (2025) “Impact of intergenerational trauma on second-generation descendants: a systematic review,” BMC Psychology. BioMed Central. doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03012-4.
• Fagermoen, E.M. et al. (2023) “Parent-Led Stepped Care Trauma Treatment: Parents’ Experiences With Helping Their Child Recover,” Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 16(4), p. 1065. doi:10.1007/s40653-023-00537-x.
• Giebel, C. et al. (2014) “South Asian older adults with memory impairment: improving assessment and access to dementia care,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. Wiley, p. 345. doi:10.1002/gps.4242.
• Goodman, R.D. (2013) “The transgenerational trauma and resilience genogram,” Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 26, p. 386. doi:10.1080/09515070.2013.820172.
• Herat-Gunaratne, R. et al. (2020) “"In the Bengali Vocabulary, There Is No Such Word as Care Home”: Caring Experiences of UK Bangladeshi and Indian Family Carers of People Living With Dementia at Home.”
• Hershatter, A. and Epstein, M. (2010) “Millennials and the World of Work: An Organization and Management Perspective,” Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), p. 211. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y.
• Hong, Y.R. and Park, J.S. (2012) “Impact of attachment, temperament and parenting on human development,” Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 55(12), p. 449. doi:10.3345/kjp.2012.55.12.449.
• Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2000) Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. Available at: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA57075295 (Accessed: February 2025).
• Jackson, K. (2018) “Factors Influencing Millennials’ Perception of and Attitudes Toward Therapy.” Available at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1106&context=etd (Accessed: June 2025).
• Kellermann, N.P.F. (2013) “Epigenetic transmission of Holocaust trauma: can nightmares be inherited?,” PubMed, 50(1), p. 33. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24029109 (Accessed: February 2025).
• Kolk, B.A. van der and Fisler, R.E. (1994) “Childhood abuse and neglect and loss of self-regulation.,” PubMed, 58(2), p. 145. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7519094 (Accessed: February 2025).
• Lee, S., Matthews, B. and Torres, J. (2025) “Cultural Silence and Emotional Suppression in Asian-American Families: A Phenomenological Exploration,” 6(2), p. 135. doi:10.61838/kman.aftj.6.2.14.
• Lee, W. (2019) “Working transgenerationally: a clinical discussion on family dynamics and treatment,” Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), p. 499. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12286.
• Leiner, B. (2009) “The Legacy of War: An Intergenerational Perspective,” Smith College Studies in Social Work, 79, p. 375. doi:10.1080/00377310903249884.
• Löve, J. et al. (2021) “Experiences of family violence and parental unavailability in childhood in relation to parental socioeconomic position and psychological problems: a cohort study of young Swedish women 1990–2013,” BMC Women's Health, 21(1). doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01292-7. 
• Martínez, C.P.I.C. (2006) “Abusive Family Experiences and Object Relations Disturbances,” Clinical Case Studies, 5(3), p. 209. doi:10.1177/1534650104264922.
• Matosin, N., Cruceanu, C. and Binder, E.B. (2017) “Preclinical and Clinical Evidence of DNA Methylation Changes in Response to Trauma and Chronic Stress,” Chronic Stress, 1. doi:10.1177/2470547017710764.
• Miller, C.W.T. (2021) “The Impact of Stress Within and Across Generations: Neuroscientific and Epigenetic Considerations,” Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 29(4), p. 303. doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000300.
• Mishne, J.M. (1996) “Resistance to Fatherhood and Excessive Filial Obligation:,” Journal of Analytic Social Work, 3(4), p. 43. doi:10.1300/j408v03n04_04.
• Mohatt, N.V. et al. (2014) “Historical trauma as public narrative: A conceptual review of how history impacts present-day health,” Social Science & Medicine. Elsevier BV, p. 128. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.043.
• Monaco, A.P. (2020) “An epigenetic, transgenerational model of increased mental health disorders in children, adolescents and young adults,” European Journal of Human Genetics. Springer Nature, p. 387. doi:10.1038/s41431-020-00726-4.
• Mooren, T. et al. (2023) “Combatting intergenerational effects of psychotrauma with multifamily therapy,” Frontiers in Psychiatry. Frontiers Media. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867305.
• Porges, S.W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. New York: Norton.
• Pramono, P. et al. (2020) “Organic Parenting Pattern as an Early Childhood Behavior Control Strategy in the Millennial Era.” doi:10.2991/assehr.k.201112.007.
• Ridhuan, S.A. et al. (2021) “Advocating for a Collaborative Research Approach on Transgenerational Transmission of Trauma,” Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 14(4), p. 527. doi:10.1007/s40653-021-00369-7.
• Sangalang, C.C. and Vang, C. (2016) “Intergenerational Trauma in Refugee Families: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. Springer Science+Business Media, p. 745. doi:10.1007/s10903-016-0499-7.
• Siegel, D.J. (2012). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Sirikantraporn, S. and Green, J. (2016) “Introduction: Multicultural Perspectives of Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma,” Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 25(6), p. 559. doi:10.1080/10926771.2016.1194941.
• Swanzen, R. (2018) “Facing the generation chasm: The parenting and teaching of generations Y and Z,” International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), p. 125. doi:10.18357/ijcyfs92201818216. 
• Teicher, M.H. & Samson, J.A. (2016). Annual research review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 241–266.
• Thomason, M.E. and Marusak, H.A. (2016) “Toward understanding the impact of trauma on the early developing human brain,” Neuroscience. Elsevier BV, p. 55. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.022.
• Tsabary, S. (2010). The conscious parent: Transforming ourselves, empowering our children. New York: Atria Books.
• Ullah, H. et al. (2023) “Intergenerational trauma: A silent contributor to mental health deterioration in Afghanistan,” Brain and Behavior, 13(4). doi:10.1002/brb3.2905.
• Wade, J.C., Marks, L.I. and Hetzel, R.D. (2015) Positive psychology on the college campus, Oxford University Press eBooks. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB20246161 (Accessed: February 2025).
• Wilson, R.S., Krueger, K.R., Arnold, S.E., et al. (2006). Chronic psychological distress and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in old age. Neuroepidemiology, 27(3), 143–150.
• Wolynn, M. (2016). It didn't start with you: how inherited family trauma shapes who we are and how to end the cycle. New York: Viking.
• Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N.P., Lehrner, A. et al. (2016). Influences of maternal and paternal PTSD on epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in Holocaust survivor offspring. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(8), 856-864.
• Yehuda, R. and Lehrner, A. (2018) “Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: putative role of epigenetic mechanisms,” World Psychiatry, 17(3), p. 243. doi:10.1002/wps.20568.
• Youssef, N.A. et al. (2018) “The Effects of Trauma, with or without PTSD, on the Transgenerational DNA Methylation Alterations in Human Offsprings,” Brain Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 83. doi:10.3390/brainsci8050083.
• Zhao, J., Zhao, H. and Zhou, A. (2023) “Negative Parenting Styles and Psychological Crisis in Adolescents: Testing a Moderated Mediating Model of School Connectedness and Self-Esteem,” Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), p. 929. doi:10.3390/bs13110929.
• Zhou, A. and Ryan, J. (2023) “Biological Embedding of Early-Life Adversity and a Scoping Review of the Evidence for Intergenerational Epigenetic Transmission of Stress and Trauma in Humans,” Genes. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 1639. doi:10.3390/genes14081639.